Washington, DC/--°
Updating
Subscribe free
Pop Culture

A Grammy-winning producer says Drake stole the chorus of 'Janice STFU' and is suing to prove it

Aviel Calev Hirschfield filed a federal copyright suit Friday claiming the hook of Drake's biggest hit of 2026 came directly from a demo he sent to OVO's circle months before the song dropped. Drake's camp calls it a money grab.

A Grammy-winning producer says Drake stole the chorus of 'Janice STFU' and is suing to prove it

Drake can't seem to stay out of court, and this time the fight is over the song that defined his 2026. On Friday, October 16, a Portland-based producer and songwriter named Aviel Calev Hirschfield filed a federal copyright infringement lawsuit claiming that the chorus of Drake's smash "Janice STFU" is, word for word and note for note, his.

Hirschfield filed the complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, naming Drake, OVO Sound, UMG Recordings, and Universal Music Publishing as defendants. The suit landed just hours before Drake's team found out and fired back hard.

What the lawsuit actually says

Hirschfield, a Grammy-winning producer and engineer, says he wrote the eight-line chorus between December 2025 and January 2026, over an instrumental from the producer duo FnZ. He says he wrote it with Drake in mind after hearing Lykke Li's "I Follow Rivers" on a drive to Seattle. He finished the recording around January 25 and sent it to FnZ and other producers in Drake's circle, but says no one replied.

He says he first heard "Janice STFU" around May 15 and was stunned to find a chorus he calls literally identical in lyrics, melody, and cadence. He registered his work with the Copyright Office effective July 21, 2026.

Hirschfield says he even provided audio files with timestamps to back up his claims, but Drake's camp refused to give him credit or a cut of the profits. According to Complex, Hirschfield seeks profits and damages from Drake and his label partners over the chart-topping track, which has surpassed 300 million Spotify streams.

This is not some anonymous claimant taking a shot in the dark. Hirschfield is a Portland-based hip-hop artist, producer, and engineer who has won a Grammy, and he is no stranger to Drake's orbit. He co-wrote and produced "Heated" on Beyoncé's Renaissance alongside him. That prior credit is the whole spine of his argument: he already had a professional conduit directly into Drake's producing circle.

According to Billboard, which obtained the complaint, Hirschfield alleges that the finished record contains a hook "literally identical" to his earlier work. The disagreement has also taken a contentious turn, with the songwriter accusing Drake's representatives of suggesting he manipulated his recording files to support his claim.

Drake's response, in full

Swift and blunt. A rep for Drake told TMZ: "These allegations are categorically, unequivocally, and completely denied. There is not one iota of truth to these accusations." The rep went on to call the lawsuit a "manufactured and baseless attempt" to exploit Drake's name and success for money and attention.

Drake's team added: "Drake wrote this song and has no connection or knowledge of this person full stop." That's a complete denial of any relationship, which puts them directly at odds with the co-writing credit the two share on the Beyoncé album.

Why 'Janice STFU' matters so much right now

The stakes are enormous because the song is not just a hit. It is a historic one. The song debuted at number one on the U.S. Billboard Hot 100, the Canadian Hot 100, and the Billboard Global 200, with that Hot 100 debut allowing Drake to break Michael Jackson's record for overall number-one U.S. hits by a male solo artist.

A total of 42 tracks from his ICEMAN trilogy appeared on the Hot 100 dated May 30, 2026, and Drake claimed nine of the Top 10 spots, with songs like "Ran to Atlanta," "Whisper My Name," and "Shabang" landing in the top positions. Per Billboard, "Janice STFU" drew 69.4 million streams and sold 3,000 copies worldwide in its first week alone (May 15 to 21), according to Luminate.

In other words, whoever owns that chorus owns a piece of the biggest hip-hop moment of the year. The financial exposure here, between streaming royalties, publishing, and potential damages, runs into the tens of millions of dollars.

Where this goes from here

Copyright cases over hooks are notoriously hard to win, and Drake's legal record in high-profile disputes has been inconsistent. But Hirschfield arrives with credentials and paper: a prior songwriting relationship with Drake's inner circle, timestamped audio files, and a Copyright Office registration dated before the suit was filed. He also says he gave Drake's representatives his stems with the metadata intact, yet his requests for a co-writer credit and publishing splits were refused.

HotNewHipHop notes that between December 2025 and January 2026, Hirschfield claims he developed a demo incorporating an interpolation of Lykke Li's 2011 song "I Follow Rivers." That layer adds a second copyright question: if Hirschfield's demo interpolated Lykke Li and Drake's chorus sounds like that demo, Lykke Li's publishers could eventually surface too.

Rolling Out reports the suit is live in federal court as of October 16. No hearing date has been set. Drake's lawyers have not yet filed a formal response to the complaint. The next move is theirs.

Sources