Washington, DC/--°
Updating
Subscribe free
Women & Power

Martha Jones on Black Women, Suffrage, and the Power They Were Denied

Historian Martha Jones joins Mount Vernon's podcast to reveal how Black women fought for suffrage — and were systematically excluded from its victory.

Black women helped build the American suffrage movement from the ground up — and were then pushed to the back of the march. Historian Martha Jones, appearing on Mount Vernon's Season 2 podcast, makes the case that the story of women winning the vote cannot be told honestly without centering the Black women who organized, agitated, and were ultimately betrayed by the movement they helped create.

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • Historian Martha Jones argues Black women were foundational leaders in the American suffrage movement — not peripheral participants.
  • The 19th Amendment's ratification in 1920 did not extend meaningful voting rights to most Black women, who faced Jim Crow-era suppression for decades after.
  • Jones's scholarship challenges the dominant suffrage narrative, which centers white women like Susan B. Anthony while erasing figures such as Ida B. Wells and Mary Church Terrell.
  • Mount Vernon's podcast positions American founding-era history within ongoing conversations about race, gender, and democratic access.
  • This conversation carries specific weight in Washington, DC — a city still navigating its own incomplete democracy and the legacies of its Black women leaders.

Martha Jones and the History Washington Keeps Forgetting

Martha S. Jones is not interested in comfortable history. A professor at Johns Hopkins University and author of Vanguard: How Black Women Broke Barriers, Won the Vote, and Insisted on Equality for All, Jones has spent her career excavating the stories of Black women who shaped American democracy while being denied its full protections. Her appearance on Mount Vernon's Season 2, Episode 6 podcast is the latest platform she's used to make that argument to a broad audience.

The episode reframes suffrage not as a linear triumph but as a fractured coalition — one where racial solidarity repeatedly collapsed under the pressure of white political expediency. Jones draws on figures like Ida B. Wells, the anti-lynching journalist who was told to march at the back of the 1913 Washington suffrage parade, and Mary Church Terrell, the DC-based activist and co-founder of the National Association of Colored Women, who spent decades fighting both racial and gender discrimination simultaneously.

For anyone who has walked past the National Museum of American History on the Mall or toured the Belmont-Paul Women's Equality National Monument on Capitol Hill, Jones's intervention is a direct challenge: whose faces are in those exhibits, and whose stories get footnoted?

The 19th Amendment's Incomplete Victory — And Why It Still Matters in 2026

The 19th Amendment was ratified in 1920. For most Black women in the American South, it meant almost nothing for another 45 years. Poll taxes, literacy tests, and outright violence kept Black women — and men — from exercising the franchise that white suffragists had celebrated as a universal victory. Jones is precise on this point: the amendment was a win for white women. Black women had to keep fighting.

That history lands differently in Washington, DC, a majority-Black city that spent most of the 20th century without voting representation in Congress and still lacks a voting senator or full congressional representation. The DC Vote organization has long framed the District's disenfranchisement as a racial justice issue — and Jones's scholarship provides exactly the historical scaffolding that argument deserves.

According to History.com's overview of the 19th Amendment, it took until the Voting Rights Act of 1965 before Black women in the South could vote without systematic obstruction. That's 45 years of a supposed victory that excluded the women who helped build it.

Why Mount Vernon Is Telling This Story Now

Mount Vernon — George Washington's estate in Fairfax County, Virginia — might seem like an unlikely venue for a conversation about Black women's suffrage leadership. But the institution has been deliberately expanding its interpretive lens over the past several years, acknowledging the enslaved people who built and sustained the estate while presenting Washington's legacy with more complexity than traditional hagiography allows.

Related: White House Mocks Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's Wedding

Related: MEAC Commissioner Sonja O. Stills Wins Nike Executive of the Year

Related: Howard University Students Who Defied Virginia's Jim Crow Bus Laws

Inviting Martha Jones into that conversation signals something intentional. Mount Vernon draws roughly one million visitors annually, many of them school groups and international tourists forming their first impressions of American democratic history. When those visitors encounter a podcast that centers Black women's leadership, the institutional reach of Jones's scholarship multiplies significantly.

For DC's own cultural and educational institutions — from Howard University's history department in LeDroit Park to the Anacostia Community Museum in Southeast — Jones's work offers a model for how public history can reckon honestly with race and gender without softening the record. Explore more on how HBCU institutions shape DC's intellectual landscape on our Howard & HBCU guide.

Black Women's Leadership: DC's Living Inheritance

Get The DC Insider

Our best stories, every Tuesday and Friday. Free.

Subscribe

Washington has always been shaped by Black women in power, even when that power went unrecognized. Mary Church Terrell fought for desegregation in DC restaurants well into her eighties. Eleanor Holmes Norton, DC's non-voting congressional delegate, has served since 1991 and remains one of the most consequential voices on Capitol Hill without a floor vote. Muriel Bowser has governed the District since 2015, navigating federal overreach and local autonomy with the kind of political dexterity Jones's historical subjects would recognize immediately.

Jones's podcast appearance is a reminder that this lineage is not accidental. It was built — by organizers, journalists, lawyers, and educators who refused to accept that their citizenship was conditional. As Jones argues in Vanguard, Black women did not wait for the movement to include them. They led it, often without credit, and their descendants are still leading.

Follow DC's most powerful political players past and present on our DC Power Players Index and track the city's broader political dynamics on our DC Politics Guide 2026.

Why This Matters in Washington

Washington, DC is simultaneously the capital of American democracy and a city that has spent most of its history excluded from it. No Senate representation. A Congress that can override local law. A majority-Black population that watched federal policy be made in its backyard while its own residents lacked full political power. Martha Jones's conversation about suffrage and Black women's leadership is not abstract history for this city — it is living context.

The National Archives, the Library of Congress, the Smithsonian Institution — all within a few Metro stops of each other — hold the documents, photographs, and artifacts of the women Jones discusses. For Washingtonians, this history is not in a textbook. It's in the reading rooms on Pennsylvania Avenue and in the neighborhood streets of Shaw, LeDroit Park, and Anacostia where those women organized. Jones's work asks the city to look at what it already holds and tell the full story.

Track the people shaping DC's political and cultural future on our Political Influence Rankings.


FAQ: Martha Jones, Suffrage, and Black Women's Leadership

Q: Who is Martha Jones and why is her work significant?
A: Martha S. Jones is a historian at Johns Hopkins University and author of Vanguard: How Black Women Broke Barriers, Won the Vote, and Insisted on Equality for All. Her scholarship centers Black women as foundational leaders in the American suffrage movement, correcting a historical record that has long prioritized white suffragists.

Q: Did Black women benefit from the 19th Amendment when it passed in 1920?
A: Not meaningfully in most of the country. While the 19th Amendment granted women the right to vote, Jim Crow laws — poll taxes, literacy tests, and voter intimidation — effectively prevented most Black women from voting, particularly in the South, until the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Q: What is Mount Vernon's podcast about?
A: Mount Vernon's podcast explores American history through conversations with leading scholars and historians. Season 2, Episode 6 features Martha Jones discussing Black women's leadership in the suffrage movement, part of the institution's broader effort to present a more complete and racially honest account of American democratic history.

Q: Who were the key Black women leaders in the suffrage movement?
A: Ida B. Wells, the journalist and anti-lynching activist, and Mary Church Terrell, the DC-based educator and co-founder of the National Association of Colored Women, are among the most significant. Both were actively marginalized by white suffrage leaders despite their central organizing roles.

Q: How does Black women's suffrage history connect to Washington, DC specifically?
A: DC has its own fraught democratic history — the city still lacks voting representation in Congress — and was home to pivotal suffrage events, including the 1913 suffrage parade where Ida B. Wells was told to march at the back. DC figures like Mary Church Terrell and Eleanor Holmes Norton represent a direct line of Black women's political leadership in the capital.

Q: Where can I learn more about Black women's role in American political history?
A: Martha Jones's book Vanguard is the essential starting point. The National Museum of African American History and Culture on the Mall, the Anacostia Community Museum, and Howard University's Moorland-Spingarn Research Center in DC all hold significant collections on this history.


Get The DC Insider

Our best stories, every Tuesday and Friday. Free.

Subscribe

What to Watch Next

As the national conversation about voting rights, democratic access, and representation continues to intensify heading into the 2026 midterm cycle, expect Martha Jones and scholars like her to become increasingly prominent voices in both academic and public forums. Mount Vernon's decision to platform this conversation suggests more cultural institutions will follow — broadening the mainstream suffrage narrative beyond the figures who have long dominated it. In Washington, where the fight for DC statehood remains unresolved and the legacy of Black political leadership is both celebrated and contested, that reckoning is long overdue. Watch this space — and watch the women who have always been at the front of it.

Reporting drawn from: Mount Vernon (mountvernon.org). Washington DC Magazine provides original analysis, DC-specific context, and editorial perspective beyond the source material.This article was produced with AI assistance and reviewed by WDCM editorial staff. Washington DC Magazine is committed to accuracy, transparency, and editorial integrity. If you believe any information in this article requires correction, please contact editor@washingtondcmagazine.com.