Washington, DC/--°
Updating
Subscribe free
National News

Trump orders DOJ to probe Democrats' impeachment threats as a collision course takes shape in Washington

With Congress back Monday and a Dec. 11 shutdown clock already ticking, the president directed the Justice Department to investigate Democratic leaders over what he called criminal extortion, while the incoming House Oversight chair promised sweeping subpoenas the moment power changes hands.

President Donald Trump escalated his post-election counteroffensive Saturday, directing the Justice Department to investigate Democratic leaders over what he called criminal threats to impeach administration officials, as Congress prepares to gavel in Monday for a lame-duck session already defined by confrontation and a government funding deadline less than five weeks away.

The move lands at a volatile moment. Democrats swept both chambers of Congress on Nov. 3, and the incoming House Oversight Committee chair, Rep. Robert Garcia of California, has spent the past week making clear his party does not intend to wait until January to put the administration on notice.

What Trump said, and what he didn't

Trump on Saturday ordered the Justice Department to investigate what he called criminal threats by Democratic leaders against administration officials, Republican donors and supporters, accusing them of using impeachment and the prospect of imprisonment to intimidate political opponents.

Trump said he was ordering the DOJ to investigate Democratic leaders over what he described as threats against Republican officials, donors and supporters, without identifying the alleged communications or providing evidence of criminal conduct. He published the directive on Truth Social rather than through any formal executive order or written presidential memorandum.

In the post, Trump wrote: "The Democrats are going around threatening a lot of people, including the Attorney General of the United States, and others, with Impeachment and many other forms of punishment, even though they admit they have no reason to do so, and there have been no impeachable acts committed, or even thought of, by the victims of this illegal process."

Trump concluded his post by saying "these EXTORTIONISTS" should be imprisoned, adding that he wanted the DOJ to investigate the alleged actions as a "criminal act."

Trump further alleged that Democratic leaders had sent threatening letters to innocent individuals, although he did not identify the recipients or specify which communications he wanted investigated.

No DOJ statement confirming the opening of any formal investigation had been issued as of Sunday morning.

Garcia fires back, and so does Hegseth

The president's post was a direct response to Garcia. Garcia, the California Democrat poised to lead the powerful House Oversight Committee, doubled down on his warning to Trump and his allies Friday, releasing a video promising sweeping investigations into the administration.

Garcia warned Trump and his allies to "lawyer up" and said Democrats will take control of the House in January, giving them the power to issue subpoenas and compel testimony as they ramp up scrutiny of the Trump administration.

Garcia has previewed four major areas he will prioritize: what he calls "Trump family corruption," DHS and ICE abuses, corporate corruption and the Jeffrey Epstein scandal. Garcia has previously said he wants to subpoena Attorney General Todd Blanche over the Justice Department's handling of the Epstein files and the pages that were withheld.

Rep. Garcia also singled out Stephen Miller, Corey Lewandowski, Kristi Noem and Trump family members as particular individuals the committee would target.

Tech executives closest to Trump, including SpaceX's Elon Musk, Meta's Mark Zuckerberg and Nvidia's Jensen Huang, are expected to be early targets for House Oversight, Energy and Commerce and Senate Commerce. Democrats will also want to question OpenAI's Sam Altman and Anthropic's Dario Amodei about their AI products.

Garcia is not alone. Rep. Jamie Raskin has said the Judiciary Committee's "number one" priority will be "looking at systems of bribery, kickback and financial corruption and opportunities for disgorgement and restitution to the American people." Rep. Bennie Thompson will focus on DHS contractors at the Homeland Security Committee. Rep. Maxine Waters will focus on deregulation and the banking and crypto industries at the Financial Services Committee.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, himself facing a possible impeachment vote once the lame-duck session begins, did not stay quiet. Hegseth urged troops to "ignore the noise" in a video posted to social media Saturday, insisting the Trump administration is "more resolute than ever to finish what we have started." Trump expressed confidence in Hegseth during a post-election interview with "60 Minutes," as the defense secretary faces a potential impeachment vote.

The lame duck opens Monday, with a Dec. 11 cliff

Congress returns to Capitol Hill on Nov. 9. The backdrop is bleak for anyone hoping for smooth legislating. Top of the agenda is the stopgap funding bill passed earlier this year to keep the government open through Election Day, which expires Dec. 11. A government shutdown is possible before the holidays if lawmakers cannot agree on a spending package.

The stopgap bill that Trump signed on September 2, now Public Law 119-103, keeps every federal agency funded through Friday, December 11, 2026.

Trump faces a government funding deadline in just 37 days, with Democrats' sweeping midterm victories threatening to complicate budget negotiations that Republicans had hoped to resolve before losing control of Congress.

So far this year, Congress has not yet passed any of the usual 12 appropriations bills. The fact that Trump needs the continuing resolution to keep many of his projects going gives Democrats a fair amount of power, even in the lame-duck session.

The agenda also includes the remaining fiscal year 2027 spending bills, the National Defense Authorization Act and the Farm Bill. Both stalled ahead of the midterms. The farm bill expired on September 30, and the surveillance authority known as FISA Section 702 has been lapsed since June.

There is about zero chance that Congress will pass Trump's full $1.5 trillion National Defense Authorization Act, according to the American Prospect's Robert Kuttner. Some Republicans are preparing to push for one last filibuster-bypassing reconciliation bill to enact remaining legislative priorities, like a boost to defense spending, but it's not clear the bruised party will have the votes to try.

In the final weeks of the year, Republican leaders will also attempt to carry out Trump's top directives before the majority of both chambers flips. Democrats are unlikely to cooperate knowing they will be in charge in 2027, which gives them an edge in negotiations.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune has said a debt limit increase could come in the lame duck.

Constitutional questions in the courts

The clash over oversight powers will not stay inside the Capitol. The Supreme Court is weighing a case that could end an already limited ability to sue federal agents, like ICE, for constitutional violations. The widely shared images of immigration enforcement agents using violence to carry out the Trump administration's crackdown put the spotlight on how difficult it is to take federal officers to court.

If the 1971 Bivens decision is eliminated, there will be "literally no way to sue in federal court when a federal agent like ICE violates the Constitution," according to one attorney involved in related litigation. In recent years, the court has sought to limit the ability to sue federal employees, including barring lawsuits in cases that are "different in a meaningful way" from the details spelled out in Bivens or the two other cases in which the Supreme Court has allowed similar constitutional claims.

Separately, the Supreme Court last week rejected the Trump administration's emergency application seeking to segregate ballots in California. The court rejected the emergency application without explanation or any publicly noted dissent, leaving the lower courts' refusals to grant emergency relief undisturbed.

What to Watch

  • Nov. 9: Congress gavels back in. Watch whether House Republicans can hold together enough votes to elect a speaker before the floor even turns to spending or defense. Any Republican defections could stall the entire lame-duck agenda before it starts.
  • DOJ response: DOJ previously investigated Michigan Sen. Elissa Slotkin over a separate matter. Whether Attorney General Todd Blanche formally opens an inquiry targeting congressional Democrats, or quietly shelves Trump's Truth Social directive, will signal how aggressively the department is willing to move against the incoming majority.
  • Garcia subpoena timeline: When the new Congress convenes in January, Democrats will gain control of the committee's subpoena power, allowing them to compel testimony and obtain documents. The first formal subpoena targets will reveal whether Garcia starts with administration officials or goes straight for Trump family business records.
  • Dec. 11 shutdown clock: If Congress misses December 11, a funding gap would begin the next day, a Saturday, which changes how a shutdown would look at first. Talks between Johnson and Democratic leaders on what gets attached to any CR have not been reported as having started.
  • Bivens at the Supreme Court: Oral argument in the case testing whether Americans can sue federal agents for constitutional violations is pending this term. The Justice Department has urged the justices to close the door on such claims entirely. Rory Little, who teaches constitutional and criminal law at the University of California College of the Law, San Francisco, predicted the court will either "overrule an old civil rights precedent" or "once again" say it doesn't apply to the latest case, with the result, Little wrote, seeming "pretty much preordained."

Sources