Washington, DC/--°
Updating
Subscribe free
Elections and Accountability

Six MPD officers and one civilian charged with stealing $441,000 in fake overtime, and D.C. residents paid every dollar

AG Brian Schwalb's office says five current or former Metropolitan Police officers and a civilian employee falsified overtime records for years, costing taxpayers nearly half a million dollars. The case tests how seriously the District will pursue fraud inside its own police force.

When a Metropolitan Police officer clocks overtime, D.C. taxpayers assume the work happened. For years, according to Attorney General Brian Schwalb's office, a group of officers and one civilian employee inside MPD gambled on that assumption and won, until MPD's own Internal Affairs Division started noticing the numbers didn't add up.

The charges Schwalb announced against the six, former Sergeant Frantz Fulcher, Officer Dorrie Smith-Cleere, Officer Thomas Krmenec, former Senior Police Officer Bernadette Richardson, former Lieutenant Peter Sheldon, and civilian employee Johnnie Dyer, land at a raw moment for a city already rattled by the federal bribery trial of Ward 8 Councilmember Trayon White and a budget fight between the mayor's office and the D.C. Council. Corruption inside City Hall is one thing. Corruption inside the police department is another conversation entirely, one that cuts directly to the question of whether the city's foundational public-safety institution is watching itself.

What they're accused of

Five current or former officers and a civilian employee falsified overtime claims and received a total of $441,137 in pay they did not earn, Schwalb said. They are accused of forging approvals and altering official overtime records.

The scheme wasn't subtle. Among the methods the defendants allegedly used were claiming overtime while outside of the District, including while traveling, and while on leave, the U.S. Attorney's office said in a news release. Other methods included claiming overtime while physically abroad on domestic and international trips, and using administrative positions to facilitate fraudulent overtime processing and approvals.

An investigation into the fraud scheme was opened after MPD's Internal Affairs Division identified irregularities in overtime submissions, including unusually high volumes of claimed overtime hours and inconsistencies between claimed work activity and independent verification data.

The individual dollar amounts are striking. Former Sergeant Frantz Fulcher allegedly received $174,915.39; Officer Dorrie Smith-Cleere, $87,397.65; Officer Thomas Krmenec, $89,478.00; former Senior Police Officer Bernadette Richardson, $43,351.68; former Lieutenant Peter Sheldon, $18,272.72; and civilian Johnnie Dyer, $27,721.59. Fulcher's figure alone is more than a first-year officer's entire annual salary.

The defendants have been charged with First-Degree Fraud, First-Degree Theft, Forgery, and Uttering, per OAG. Uttering, for anyone unfamiliar with D.C. criminal code, means using a forged or altered document with intent to commit fraud. These are not misdemeanor slap-on-the-wrist charges.

Who's prosecuting and how

The mechanics of who brings this case to court reveal something important about D.C.'s status as a non-state. The U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C. will prosecute the case. "While the Home Rule Act does not grant my office the jurisdiction to directly prosecute these cases, through our partnership with the USAO, we are able to protect taxpayer dollars and root out local public corruption," Schwalb said.

The matter is being investigated by MPD's Internal Affairs Division and prosecuted by Jeremy Morris, Chief of the Fraud and Public Corruption Section at OAG, serving as a Special Assistant United States Attorney.

That arrangement is the same partnership Schwalb's office used to prosecute a separate elder financial exploitation case earlier this year. It has become the primary tool OAG uses to pursue serious public corruption that would otherwise sit outside its reach. Without it, these charges may never have been filed at all.

Schwalb said directly: "These six officers abused their positions of power, exploiting the District and the residents they took an oath to serve and protect. No one is above the law, especially those trusted with enforcing it."

Why this matters more than a typical fraud case

Police overtime in D.C. is not a small budget line. MPD regularly runs among the highest per-officer overtime costs of any major-city police department in the country, and the Council has sparred with the Bowser administration repeatedly over how those dollars are tracked and justified. This case is a documented example of what happens when internal controls fail.

The Washington City Paper, which first surfaced the charges publicly alongside the OAG release, noted that AG Brian Schwalb announced the charges, including fraud, theft, and forgery, and said the scheme resulted in D.C. paying $441,137 for work that wasn't done. (attributed, Washington City Paper)

NBC4 Washington reported the case straight from the attorney general's announcement. Six members of the Metropolitan Police Department falsified overtime claims and received hundreds of thousands of dollars in pay they didn't earn, D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb said. (attributed, NBC4 Washington)

There is also a broader institutional question here. Given the limited criminal jurisdiction of the D.C. government under the Home Rule Act, prosecutions of adult felonies such as this are handled by the federal government through the U.S. Attorney's Office for D.C. That dependency puts D.C. in a position most cities don't face: to hold its own police accountable in court, it needs the cooperation of a federal office it does not control, currently headed by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro, a Trump appointee. So far, that cooperation has held. There is no guarantee it always will. (analysis)

The 'rank matters' problem

Look at who is on this list. A former sergeant. A former lieutenant. A civilian in an administrative position. These are not rookies who got greedy on a weekend shift. Supervisors sign off on overtime. Supervisors have the system access to alter records. The OAG's investigation identified several recurring methods used by the MPD employees to unlawfully obtain overtime compensation, including claiming overtime while physically outside of the city during domestic and international travel, and using administrative positions to facilitate fraudulent overtime processing and approvals.

The word "widespread" in Schwalb's official announcement title is doing real work. This was not one rogue officer padding a few hours. Schwalb announced that warrants were signed seeking the arrest of six members of MPD for falsifying overtime claims by forging supervisory approvals and manipulating official overtime records. An investigation into the fraud scheme was opened after MPD's Internal Affairs Division identified irregularities in overtime submissions, including unusually high volumes of claimed overtime hours and inconsistencies between claimed work activity and independent verification data.

The OAG has not said publicly how long the scheme ran, nor have officials said whether the investigation is complete or whether additional subjects remain under scrutiny. Those are open questions. (verified: charges filed, timeline not publicly specified)

The political backdrop

This case lands in the middle of an already turbulent stretch for D.C. government accountability. The Trayon White federal bribery trial, the case of a sitting councilmember accused of taking $35,000 in cash from an FBI informant and angling for $156,000 more to steer violence-prevention contracts, begins September 14. Councilmember Trayon White is set to go on trial next week, accused of accepting bribes in exchange for helping secure government contracts, and is charged with one count of bribery.

Meanwhile, Judge Contreras ruled the government cannot use certain ethical guidelines within the D.C. Council's Code of Conduct as evidence against White, agreeing that the simple act of taking money without doing anything in return may violate the council's code, but could also be just a "quid, but no quo," as he wrote in the ruling, adding that attaching a federal bribery charge to them with 15 years in prison is "a bridge too far."

Two accountability cases, running simultaneously, in two of the District's most visible public institutions. The Council and the police department. Neither is a coincidence of timing. Both reflect years of deferred internal discipline. (analysis)

The MPD case also hits as the D.C. Council prepares to reconvene September 22 after its summer recess, with a Metro funding deal expiration and a city budget dispute already waiting on the docket. Adding a sweeping police overtime fraud scandal to that agenda is not a scenario any councilmember will find comfortable, particularly those who have spent years defending MPD budget requests that included, almost certainly, some portion of the dollars now alleged to be fraudulent.

What D.C. Residents Should Watch

  • Arraignment dates: Arrest warrants have been signed but the OAG has not publicly confirmed arraignment dates for all six defendants. Watch the D.C. Superior Court docket and the OAG newsroom for scheduling.
  • MPD's internal response: Chief Pamela Smith's office has not publicly stated whether the six have been suspended or placed on administrative leave. That answer matters. Officers who are still drawing a paycheck while facing First-Degree Fraud charges is a different situation than officers who have been pulled from duty.
  • Scope of the investigation: The OAG said Internal Affairs opened the probe after finding unusually high overtime volumes. That phrasing suggests a pattern-level review, not a single tip. Whether more subjects are under scrutiny is unknown. Residents should press MPD and OAG directly.
  • Council oversight hearing: The D.C. Council's Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety, chaired by Brooke Pinto, has jurisdiction over MPD. Expect pressure to schedule an oversight hearing once the Council returns September 22. Whether that hearing happens quickly or gets buried under Metro and budget fights is worth watching.
  • The USAO relationship: AG Schwalb's office can investigate but needs the U.S. Attorney's Office to prosecute felonies. The current U.S. Attorney is a federal appointee. If that cooperation frays for any reason, political or otherwise, these charges could be affected. Track any signals from the USAO about its commitment to the case.

Sources