Washington, DC/--°
Updating
Subscribe free
Elections and Accountability

The budget fight Janeese Lewis George will inherit the morning after she wins

Agency overspending, a defiant CFO, and a Council chair who called Bowser's witness blackout "shocking", the pile waiting on the next mayor's desk is already visible.

Why it matters before a single ballot is counted

Barring something extraordinary, D.C. voters will elect Janeese Lewis George as mayor on Tuesday, ending Muriel Bowser's twelve years in office and making Lewis George, a 38-year-old Ward 4 council member and member of the Democratic Socialists of America, all but certain to become the latest democratic socialist to lead a major American city. That part is settled. What is not settled is how she pays for any of it.

In the final 48 hours of the campaign, a clearer picture has emerged of exactly what waits on the ninth floor of the John A. Wilson Building after the votes are counted: a chronic agency overspending problem that Bowser's team refused to explain to the Council last week, a public fight between the city's chief financial officer and its auditor over whether reserve funds were raided illegally for six straight years, and a projected shortfall that has already forced hard choices about child care, health care, and education. These are not hypothetical future problems. They are happening now, and Lewis George will own them in January.

The hearing nobody answered

On Thursday, October 29, the D.C. Council held a roundtable specifically on why city agencies keep spending more money than the Council approves for them. The Bowser administration declined to send the agency representatives lawmakers wanted to question, and Council Chairman Phil Mendelson told reporters afterward: "I'm shocked that the mayor withheld witnesses from this hearing to talk about the budget."

Short. Blunt. And not the first time he has said something like it. The "shocking" characterization echoes Mendelson's earlier outrage over Bowser blocking witnesses during separate budget testimony, a pattern that has become, at this point, a governing style.

According to the council's official hearing notice, the executive branch declined to send a witness. That left lawmakers questioning two non-administration officials: D.C. Auditor Kathy Patterson and Chief Financial Officer Glen Lee, who are themselves in public conflict over the underlying numbers.

Lawmakers also examined whether agency leaders face consequences when their departments repeatedly exceed their original budgets. The short answer that emerged from Thursday's hearing: not really.

Mendelson acknowledged that agency overspending has declined significantly compared with last year, but said the problem has not disappeared. "But they're still overspending."

The auditor and the CFO are not agreeing on basic facts

The dispute between Patterson and Lee predates Thursday's roundtable by months. Patterson asked the Council to hold a hearing on her April report concluding that CFO Glen Lee made 301 withdrawals from contingency funds to circumvent a city law that bars agencies from exceeding their Council-approved budgets, a claim Lee's office strenuously denied.

Patterson's office is independent. Lee's office controls the city's day-to-day finances. Both of them testified Thursday because the administration's own agency heads were a no-show. Patterson told lawmakers: "There are agencies that overspend year after year after year after year, and you have to then ask yourself, how can that be?" Her testimony raised questions about whether some agencies are accurately estimating their expenses when developing annual budgets.

Lee's concern is that lawmakers could be forced to consider reducing services or increasing taxes while questions remain about how accurately agencies are budgeting their expenses. That is a careful way of saying the Council may be working off flawed numbers when it writes a budget.

The DC Line's Jonetta Rose Barras, who has covered D.C. government longer than most people in it have worked there, noted that Mendelson held "yet another roundtable" focused on agency overspending, and that one observer called it "performative," while Patterson said she is unsure whether Mendelson is simply engaged in another battle in his war with CFO Lee.

That skepticism is fair. The Council has held multiple hearings on overspending going back years. The agencies keep overspending. The question for Lewis George is what she does differently.

What Lewis George says she'll do, and what it costs

The Democratic nominee offered a preview of some of the early actions she plans to take in office, including on housing and universal child care, in a Washington Post profile published Sunday morning. The specific commitments are real. The money for them is not yet secured.

Her signature promise is a child care subsidy program that would cap what families pay. She promised that families would pay no more than 7 percent of their earned income on child care. For a family of three earning $100,000 a year, that means a monthly bill of roughly $600 instead of the $2,200 the market currently charges. Lower-income families might pay nothing.

The funding mechanism she has identified: closing an interstate tax loophole. Her team argues that businesses operating in D.C. but not paying taxes to D.C. represents a loophole that has the potential of producing $500 million in revenue for the city. That figure is contested and unlegislated.

D.C.'s existing child care subsidy program is already $32 million in the red. Expanding it to universal coverage without first closing the existing gap is the math problem her transition team has not yet answered publicly.

On housing, her agenda includes affordable housing, lowering utility costs, and instituting a business activity tax. She told reporters she has not identified specific programs she would eliminate, and that her team is "doing a real desk-by-desk audit to really see where we can improve efficiencies."

On contracts and agency accountability, one of the clearest places where the Bowser era leaves a complicated legacy, Lewis George has said she plans to address concerns about corruption and back-door deals involving major city contracts, and that the Department of Youth and Rehabilitation Services, tied to allegations of misuse of funds, is another area of focus for her.

The structural constraints nobody campaigns on

Beyond the specific programs, Lewis George faces two forces outside her direct control.

First, Congress. Any Washington mayor has limited power in the city that is home to the federal government, and President Donald Trump and the Republican-controlled Congress are threatening to limit her power further. D.C.'s budget requires congressional approval. A mayor who wants to raise taxes through a new business activity tax needs Congress not to block it, and this Congress has shown no inclination to give D.C. more fiscal room.

Second, the reprogramming problem. Patterson suggested lawmakers consider changing how they review transfers of money between agencies and programs. Those transfers, known as reprogrammings, can allow agencies to receive additional funding during the fiscal year, which is exactly the mechanism Patterson's audit accused Lee of using improperly. If Lewis George does not resolve the Patterson-Lee standoff early, she risks inheriting a budget oversight structure that neither watchdog trusts.

The D.C. Council is considering budget increases amid a projected $1 billion revenue deficit. That number sets the ceiling on what any new mayor can actually do in Year One.

The day-after picture

D.C. voters will head to the polls Tuesday to select a new mayor for the first time in over a decade. Lewis George is all but assured to win in the deep-blue District. She is a third-generation Washingtonian, a former prosecutor, and the Ward 4 council member since 2021. She knows the Wilson Building's rhythms. What she has not yet demonstrated publicly is how she will deal with an entrenched CFO whose office controls the numbers, a Council chair who has spent two terms at war with the executive branch over budget transparency, and agencies that have spent beyond their budgets for years with virtually no consequences.

The Federal City Council's Anthony Williams put it plainly at an earlier budget hearing: "The council twice approved legislation to seat an Expenditure Commission. The likely new mayor has pledged to zero-in on government efficiency. I call on everyone to make good on these commitments."

Making good on them starts Wednesday morning.

What D.C. Residents Should Watch

  • The transition team's budget document. Lewis George said her team is doing a "desk-by-desk audit" of agencies. Watch for whether that produces a public transition report with specific savings targets before her January inauguration, or whether it stays internal.
  • The CFO standoff. Glen Lee is an independent officer whose term does not end when Bowser leaves. Lewis George cannot simply replace him. Watch whether she signals a working relationship with his office or escalates the Patterson audit findings into a formal accountability process.
  • The child care subsidy math. Lewis George told reporters her team is "working now with budget analysts to see what is possible and how quickly we can open up our child care subsidy so that more families can benefit." That is a careful hedge. Watch for a dollar figure and a timeline, not just a direction.
  • The Council's reprogramming rules. Mendelson said lawmakers will have additional opportunities to question individual agencies about their spending. If those hearings happen in a lame-duck Council before January, the rules they set could bind Lewis George's budget options from day one.
  • ANC 2E and ANC 8E meet tonight (November 2, 6:30 p.m.) on separate local matters. Both are worth watching as the last scheduled neighborhood-level government sessions before Tuesday's vote reshapes who represents those communities at the Wilson Building.

Sources