Washington, DC/--°
Updating
Subscribe free
D.C. Council

Pinto asks five new Democratic governors to pull their troops from D.C. streets

Two days after midterm wins flipped Georgia, Iowa, Nevada, Ohio, and Texas blue, D.C.'s public safety chair held a Council hearing on the National Guard, and the Pentagon announced it wants even more troops here.

Why this matters to you right now

More than 2,300 National Guard troops have been patrolling D.C. streets since President Trump declared a crime emergency in August 2025. For more than a year, residents near schools like Wheatley Education Campus in Eckington have watched armed soldiers use a neighborhood parking lot as a staging area. Parents have complained. Principals have complained. And until Tuesday's midterm results, D.C.'s elected officials had almost no political leverage to do anything about it.

That changed fast.

On Thursday, November 5, Ward 2 Councilmember Brooke Pinto convened a long-planned public hearing on federal law enforcement and military activity in the city. The hearing had been scheduled for weeks. What nobody fully anticipated was the timing: it landed 48 hours after midterm elections swept Democratic candidates into five new governor's offices across the country, in states that happen to have hundreds of soldiers currently posted on D.C. corners.

The number that drove the hearing: 628

Pinto said there are about 628 National Guard members currently deployed in D.C. from five states that elected Democratic governors this week: Georgia, Iowa, Nevada, Ohio, and Texas. Those incoming governors are Keisha Lance Bottoms, Rob Sand, Aaron Ford, Amy Acton, and Gina Hinojosa, respectively.

The local lawmaker said those five states account for 628 active National Guard troops in the District. There are over 3,000 troops in Washington as of this week, about 2,000 troops below the summer high during the nation's 250th anniversary.

Pinto chairs the Council's Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety. She did not just raise the issue in the hearing room. She said, "We are calling on them to withdraw their troops immediately, and it's something they can do their first day in office." She announced plans to send formal letters to each of the five governors-elect.

At the same hearing, Pinto said that congressional leaders have been "unsympathetic to what we've been dealing with and, in some cases, directly hostile." Then came the pivot. "After Tuesday night, the tide is turning," she said. "I am very hopeful that we now have the partners at the state and congressional level to push back and demand that this unnecessary, harmful and unlawful military presence be removed from the District."

In a post on X, Pinto wrote: "Having armed National Guard troops and increased federal law enforcement in DC continues to cause fear and intimidation in our communities, and it must stop."

The Pentagon moved in the opposite direction the same morning

The hearing's timing collided with a counterpunch from Washington's other side of Pennsylvania Avenue. Pinto, who chairs the Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, held the hearing Thursday examining federal operations in the city and their impact on residents. "Disturbingly today, Secretary Hegseth announced that they want to ramp up their presence of the National Guard in the city," Pinto said.

An October 29 Pentagon memo would expand the Guard's ability to support law enforcement operations throughout the District. So while Pinto was asking five governors to send troops home, the Defense Department was formalizing plans to deepen the military footprint here. The push comes as a federal appeals court weighs whether President Trump has the legal authority to deploy out-of-state Guard units on D.C. streets.

That court fight has dragged on for months. New tensions are emerging over the National Guard in D.C., but the end of the deployment is nowhere in sight. A federal appeals court again heard arguments in D.C.'s effort to eject the National Guard, but it's unclear when a ruling may come. And even then, the fight could be headed to the Supreme Court.

The deployment itself is currently authorized through January 2029. That is more than two years away.

Who backed Pinto at the hearing

Pinto, who discussed sending a letter to the incoming governors, was supported in her call by council member Elissa Silverman (D-At Large) and former council member Robert C. White, who just won election Tuesday as the District's new congressional delegate and attended the hearing in one of his final public appearances as a Council voice before transitioning to the Hill.

The legal question underneath Pinto's request is real. The Guardsmen on duty in the District are being paid by the federal government, but remain under the control of their respective state's governors. It's unclear if the governors can recall troops on a whim, as Pinto's statement at the hearing suggests. Governors have done it before in other contexts, but no sitting governor has yet recalled Guard units from D.C. under Trump's deployment orders.

The incoming governors have not announced whether they intend to withdraw their National Guard personnel.

Months of neighborhood anger behind a single hearing

The hearing Thursday was not an improvised reaction to Tuesday's elections. A petition circulating online raised specific concerns about National Guard troops using the Wheatley Education Campus and Joseph H. Cole Recreation Center parking lot as a staging area in mid-August. Pinto scheduled the public hearing for November 5 to give D.C. residents an opportunity to share their concerns and testimony about the ongoing federal presence in the District.

Pinto says she has repeatedly urged National Guard troops to stay away from school zones. She continues to hear concerns from parents, teachers and students about the presence of troops near D.C. schools.

In September, hundreds of parents recently asked Councilmember Pinto to hold a hearing on the issue within 30 days. Thursday's session was that hearing, more than a month later but arriving at a moment with actual political wind behind it.

What the five new governors would actually need to do

Pinto's request is narrow and specific. It does not require an act of Congress, a court ruling, or the White House's cooperation. During the public hearing, Pinto said election victories by Democratic governors in Georgia, Iowa, Nevada, Ohio, and Texas offer an opportunity to recall out-of-state Guard units. She noted that those five states account for a combined 628 National Guard troops currently stationed in the capital. She said she wants the incoming governors to issue troop withdrawal orders on their first day in office.

Analysis: Whether any governor would do this, knowing it draws a direct confrontation with a sitting president over a deployment he has staked political capital on, is a different question than whether the law permits it. The governors have not signaled their intentions either way.

What D.C. Residents Should Watch

  • Governor responses: Keisha Lance Bottoms (Georgia), Rob Sand (Iowa), Aaron Ford (Nevada), Amy Acton (Ohio), and Gina Hinojosa (Texas) each take office in January 2027. Watch for any public response to Pinto's formal letters, which she said Thursday she will send.
  • The appeals court ruling: A decision from the D.C. Circuit on Trump's authority to deploy out-of-state Guard units could land before the new governors are sworn in, potentially making Pinto's diplomatic effort moot, or legally necessary.
  • The Pentagon expansion order: Secretary Hegseth's announcement Thursday of a planned ramp-up gives the administration a tool to offset any state-level withdrawals by pulling in troops from other states.
  • Schools and staging areas: Residents near Wheatley Education Campus in Eckington can track whether the November 5 hearing produces any enforceable commitment to keep Guard staging areas away from school grounds, regardless of how the broader deployment fight plays out.
  • Council follow-through: Pinto said a formal letter is coming. When it goes out, what it asks, and whether any governor responds on record will shape how much practical pressure the Council can actually apply before January.

Sources